• $70,000Total reward

Community prizes

  • $5,0001st place
  • $3,0002nd place
  • $2,0003rd place
  • $1,0004th place
  • $7505th - 6th place
  • $5007th place

Special prize

  • $10,000 Jury Award // Up To $10,000 Contract Award // See briefing for details.

Closed

Start date
28-Oct-2010, 10:59
UTC-0500
Submission deadline
17-Jan-2011, 11:59
UTC-0500
Rating deadline
24-Jan-2011, 11:59
UTC-0500
 
 
 
 
Announced
Submission period (81 Days)
Rating only (7 Days)

Briefing

Design a jewel box of an ultra-low-footprint apartment in 420sf (~39 m2).

Background

What if we could save money, radically reduce our environmental impact, and have a freer, less complicated life?

Treehugger founder Graham Hill has part of the answer: we need to have less stuff and live in smaller spaces, like the 420sf (~39 m2) apartment in New York City he will renovate in 2011. 

 

With some design and technology magic, even small space can allow for almost anything - so we’re asking you to redesign a small space thinking about these core ideas: 

  • transforming space - use one space for work, play, sleep, guests
  • digitize everything - photos, books, music
  • from ownership to access - think car-sharing instead of owning, pay-per-view instead of downloading, smart space-sharing and subletting
  • only the essentials - cut down on extraneous stuff, leaving only what’s really necessary

Task Definition

Create a design based on Graham Hill’s 420 sf (~39 m2) apartment.

 

The design needs to support the life of a real person in the apartment - someone who works, eats, lives, and entertains.  We’re looking for apartment designs that allow for:

  • a sit-down dinner for 12
  • a comfortable lounging option for 8 people
  • space for 2 guests with some visual and ideally auditory privacy
  • a home office
  • a work area with space for a rolling tool chest
  • a hideable kitchen

You must use one or more of the Resource Furniture Space Saver designs to combine some of the functions, but the rest is up to you. For additional requirements, please see Mandatory Requirements section.

 

As the room function is changed, it should not feel like you are sleeping in your office or eating in your bedroom.  At the same time, it should be easy and quick enough to change the room function that one would actually do it. This is the space we’ll be renovating. And here are some ideas we’ve compiled to get you thinking about how others have created more from less. 

 

When a design is found that meets all of Graham’s criteria (he needs to love it, since he’ll be living in the space and paying for it) an additional contract will be awarded to use the design or elements of the design in his apartment renovation. 

 

Keep in mind that feedback and conversation can help you improve your ideas. Therefore we encourage you to post and update your entry at any time up until the submission deadline. In return, you’ll receive feedback from Graham, your peers, and our jurors. 

 

JUDGING CRITERIA

Both jury and community are asked to consider the following three criteria when evaluating the designs:

Requirements - does the design meet the requirements (after all, Graham will be living in it and promoting the ideas so we really want him to be happy)?

Replicability - can the design be replicated in similar spaces with a reasonable budget? Will this design get people to consider living in this type of space, from an economic perspective?

Aesthetics - will the design look good in 25 years? Will it make us want to leave large and love little?  

 

Awards

We’re awarding up to $70,000 in cash, products, and contracts for the best ideas. The best ideas will also be featured on Treehugger, Core77 and Architizer.

 

The submission process depends on thoughtful feedback to help designers improve their submissions. We’ll also reward the best feedback with over 50 prizes.

 

Jury Award

  • $10,000 in cash
  • Contract award of up to $10,000 to consult on the renovation project
  • One week stay at the renovated apartment in NYC
  • The revolution unfolds: a Strida folding bike
  • Get together with family and friends: Cisco ?mi Telepresence system and Cisco Valet router for 2 locations plus one year of service*
  • Collaborate at work: Cisco Webex annual subscription

Community Prizes

First Place

  • $5,000 in cash
  • The Thinbike designed by Graham Hill and Schindelhauer
  • One week stay at the renovated apartment in NYC
  • Get together with family and friends: Cisco ?mi Telepresence system and Cisco Valet router for 2 locations plus one year of service*
  • Collaborate at work: Cisco Webex annual subscription

Second Place

Third Place

Fourth Place

Fifth Place

  • $750 in cash

Sixth Place

  • $750 in cash

Seventh Place

  • $500 in cash

Best Feedback to Designers

* available to winners in the North America and European Union. Winners in other regions will have the option to exchange the ?mi system for other Cisco products. European Union winners may be invited to join the ?mi beta testing program.

 

Target Group

  • Graham Hill
  • and everybody else that's looking to save money, radically reduce his/her environmental impact, and have a freer, less complicated, happier life

Mandatory requirements

Apartment Functions:

You must use one or more of the Resource Furniture Space Saver designs to combine some of the functions, but the rest is up to you.

Kitchen - The kitchen should have an induction cook-top, a combination microwave/oven, a small fridge (could be a drawer fridge), a dishwasher, an espresso machine, a juicer, a smart system for storing non-perishable food, and a soda water maker. The kitchen should be hide-able.

Bath - The apartment needs to have a toilet, a sink, a shower, and perhaps a steam room. The setup should look great, be space efficient, conserve water and energy, and have low embodied energy. Must have audio privacy.

Bed - The apartment should have at least a queen size bed, ideally raised off the floor.

Storage - Significant storage is needed for clothing, tools, sports equipment, food etc. (perhaps 300 or 400 cubic feet?)

Home Office - The office is built around a Mac 31” monitor and a 17” Macbook Pro.

Recycling and Reuse - There needs to be a convenient space/system for composting as well as a recycling and reuse "center" (stuff that will be given to friends or donated to charity).

Work Area - There should be a space to store a rolling tool cabinet and an area to do minor in-home repairs, bike maintenance, etc.

Entertainment & Telepresence - There should be Amina in-wall speakers to be used for entertainment and Cisco ?mi Telepresence. The 31” monitor will also be used in the entertainment and Telepresence center.

 

Materials and Other Considerations:

Flooring - The floor should look great, feel great, wear well, have low embodied energy, be easy to clean, and be maintainable by a Roomba.

Materials - When selecting materials, consider lifecycle and health concerns such as offgassing. Push for low embodied energy materials wherever possible.

Light, Sound - The apartment should be able to be made dark enough to not see one’s outstretched hand. Surfaces should absorb sound.

Shoes - This will be a shoeless apartment, therefore shoes need to be organized or stored near the entrance. A place to sit to take off/put on shoes might make sense as well.

Robot Servants - Low, hidden area where Roomba and Scooba cleaning robots might be stored away to charge.

Bike Storage - It would be nice to be able to hang the Strida in a closet and to slide the Schindelhauer ThinBike into a slot somewhere such that it is out of sight.

Plants - Plants should only require tending to once a month.

 

Nice to have:

Home automation - House systems might be controllable via mobile phone and internet, with simple on and off controls for all appliances.

Steam Room - It would be nice to have a few luxury items in the apartment such as a steam room. How do you optimize a steam room (less volume?), so it’s as eco-friendly as possible?

Lockable Storage - A portion of storage should be lockable such that some of it can be easily secured when the apartment is sublet.

Wall surface/area - There should be a way (magnets?) to display inspirational photos, images etc.

 

Assumptions and things already considered:

Air quality - The air will meet or surpass PlaNYC and the American Lung Association "Healthy House" certification.

Resource Usage - The space will use 70% less energy than a typical apartment, saving money and increasing peace of mind. Heating, cooling, and water usage is 20% of a similarly sized NYC apt. The apartment will be super-insulated, use high efficiency appliances and technologies such as a heat recovery ventilator to achieve this.

Lighting - It is anticipated that we will incorporate directional LED lighting into the ceiling so that none or very little additional lighting is needed anywhere.

Windows - It is assumed that we will replace the windows with super energy efficient pan and tilt models. Shading can be programmed using a Mechoshade Home System.

 

For additional information regarding the official rules, click here.

 

Download material

Click on the following links to download working material and additional information related to the project.

 
 

Comments

Show all comments (116)
  • :

    Hey guys,

    thanks for the hint, zaarchitects - I'm sorry I had to remove your post though as we're not publicly denouncing people here - you're welcome to send me your findings via private message.
    I understand your concerns re: the rating, and yes it is kind of sad that some people think they can game the system to benefit from it - but as we said before and stated here as well, we are checking the ratings and making sure that unfair rating behaviour is being identified and treated as such (members are being contacted and if they don't show an improvement in their rating behaviour their ratings are being disabled).

    Guys, please trust us a little bit, it's not our first contest ;)
    Let's stick to the positive spirit we were witnessing the whole time and not let this overshadow the last days of the contest - we are taking care of it, you enjoy the remaining days!

    • Studio_CHB
      :

      ... at least the content - with other comments - could have been left here for conversation.

      best regards

    • :

      Unfortunately it's not possible to delete just a part of a comment - neither could I leave the reply comment, it's only possible to remove it as a whole.

    • zaarchitects
      :

      Here message without links
      Hi everyone!
      all probably know about the manipulation of ratings, but we were yesterday
      make an interesting investigation - checked around two hundred
      "anonymous" account (no avatars and ideas) and the scale of unfear game
      shift our expectations! And this is just the tip of the iceberg!
      I understand if participant can invite a few friends to vote in support of his project but when they reduce the rating of good competitive projects - this is disgusting!
      There are users with dozens "dislike" and only one like project. Come on! Is this about architectural competition?
      So what should we do?
      1. We ask administration and check this accounts and disenable them from
      voting. And i hope members of community will support us, and will send to
      admins links on new suspicious electors.
      2. For next competition maybe do another system of rating? For instance
      voting possible only for participants of competition, and everyone can see
      how many stars who give for who. Or voting only for jury. Or as Aleksa
      propouse - "scores of the submissions should be hidden till the closing of the
      rating period"
      It is not blame, and we trust to people who working on jovoto, but it is our
      suggestion how to make jovoto system better.
      3.People - be polite. What is displeased use the most - destroying of
      ratings, using a few another user.

      Good luck.

    • alexandersimple
      :

      good for you! but how did you know what accounts to look for? how did you find 200? i ask because jovoto doesn't display who 'hates' an idea.

      "but when they reduce the rating of good competitive projects - this is disgusting! " ....i think it is ironic that your rating has not been reduced. if anything, your rating has grown substantially through the rating process. where do you stand on your own issue?

    • zaarchitects
      :

      first - we don't know what account to search, just check community members randomly, and we didnt FIND 200, we check around 200, and find around 20.
      second - our rating do not grow, science last days of submission its falling down, with number of another projects.
      We just don't agree with concept of minimizing ratings. We don't do that,
      and don't want to somebody do it.

  • Joshua2013
    :

    Thank you for your attention.
    I know JOVOTO is keeping an eye on users ratings but please be aware that it may get too late!
    In our case, we were in 13th place and after 8 hours those cheaters sent us to 70th place!
    while we put great effort in our projects, we will be disappointed to witness something like that.
    I hope this will all end.

    Thank you.

    • :

      hoonam,
      first of all, it will not be too late - even when the ratings close, we are still reviewing the ratings and until we ourselves close the contest, nothing is set in stone.
      However, I would like to remind you all that it's a tough competition - EVERYBODY put a lot of effort into their ideas which is why we have so many amazing entries and way more than just 10 entries that deserve to be in the Top Ten...
      So good luck everybody!

  • :

    Guys,
    let's discuss rating issues in a Public Discussion thread in the support center as this space is meant for questions on the briefing - I moved the comments above too so we can start our discussion based on them. Click here to get to the discussion space.
    Thanks!

  • zoranjor
    :

    Hi to all. I was wondering, is the jury gonna publish only the winner, or they will publish a whole list of their own rating? I am curious to see how much similarities there will be with the community rating and that of the jury. That will be another way to see how close to honest is the public vote.... more or less.

    • T_R_A_M_P_S
      :

      Personally I'd be quite surprised if the jury's shortlist bore too many similarities to the public leaderboard.

    • zoranjor
      :

      well that would say something, won't it? ok, not that its normal to have the exact same top ten in the exact same order, but at least it should be expected for the first 50 projects to be in both shortlists. it would be weird to have someone placed at 164th by the community and makes it as 5th by the jury, or vice versa. coz that would be a huge difference in ranking. and ok, if its for one project its fine, but if its for more.... or you know, it might not mean anything :) im just being curious and thinking too much about this :)

    • cushicle
      :

      The rating difference between 1st and 164th is less than 1 point. And there has been a free for all in the ratings system, probably hundreds of new users merely placing a few votes to downgrade some users and upgrade others, especially at the top. I wouldn't expect the jury to be swayed too significantly by the user ratings, though several "top" entries are deserving of their score, many seem to be artificially inflated.

  • Yair
    :

    Hello everyone,

    As a LifeEdited contestant I have to say that this is the best contest in which i have participated and the main reason for that is that NOW with communities like jovoto the results and winners can be judges, comment, or improved during the whole competition.

    It is a shame that there are many rotten apples that like to manipulate the ratings on his favor. But i trust /jovot will take care of that cheating behavior.

    BUT do you remeber how it was before?? It was soooooooo much worst. Right now some of us are wondering if there will be a short list or not, one winner or more.etc. But before (in the old fashion contest model) there was only 1 (or few) mighty winner(s) and nobody had the chance to compare their own project with others but the almighty (questionable) winners.

    IMPORTANT NOTE:
    Today, the winners are not gonna be questionable. And the so-called losers have more chances to benefit from the contest than never before. And also the cheaters have more chances to be publicly exposed as never before. So, for me, jovoto.com should be rated with a 8 "solid idea, impove it to make better"

    Yair.

    • Yair
      :

      P.S.

      To all cheaters, do you know when you become a great designer?..When you have the balls to recognize when somebody else is doing a great job :)

    • alexandersimple
      :

      well said, my friend. :)

    • superkesari
      :

      i like dat..

    • :

      Thanks for the love, yair, and you certainly hit the nail on the head with your last statement - sad to see that not everyone can give credit to all these hard working creatives that submitted amazing work to this contest!

    • Yair
      :

      Nevermind Nathalie.

      Be responsible of improving your ideas and be responsible to share your comments and be responsible of your ratings to others ideas or comments is a requirement of every Jovotoan. This responsible behavior can take us to the next level of collborative/community design. Let's think about that!!

      :-)

      Y.

      PS. Thank you Nathalie.

  • jordicapde
    :

    Whatever the results will be, we just want to say that we are very happy for having participated in this contest (we loved the precedure, jovoto, feedback, etc.)

    Thanks to all the community, and good luck to everyone!

  • Prodeoweb
    :

    For all who have participated. Thanks! I had a good time.

  • :

    Guys,
    sorry to see some bitter and partially inappropriate comments coming in - as Zerooks stated at one point, it's impossible to make everybody happy and there will always be some people that are not happy with the results - however, it would be sad to have that affecting the overall very good spirit in this contest - we witnessed good submissions turning into great ones because of the help of the community, and also many creatives that were not afraid to give credits to other creatives for their amazing work - congrats and thanks for that!

    So this is the final countdown now - please keep in mind that the current rankings do not reflect the final results - these will be announced on Thursday only - you'll find the link for the livestream here), and I hope to have all of you join us!

  • kaptn
    :

    Congrats all winners

  • tobiasvon
    :

    Big congrats to all the winners. that was a lot of fun and a great learning experience. Maybe Graham's next project will be a whole apartment building to explore things like carbon neutral building, collaborative consumption, urban farming, green walls and roofs, etc. etc. etc...